RESUMO
El objetivo del estudio fue valorar a pacientes con pérdidas perinatales remitidas y no al Departamento de Psicología, para determinar si es eficiente el proceso de derivación a la psicoterapia de grupo. Se hizo un estudio con 140 pacientes; 95 pasaron a psicoterapia y 45 no. La validez estadística se determinó con la prueba no paramétrica de Wilcoxon. Se aplicó el CGS de Goldberg, el IDARE de Spielberger y la EAMD de Zung. De las pacientes caso valoradas con el Idare Rasgo-Estado, 70 por ciento son derivadas a grupo terapéutico; con el CGS 80 por ciento y con la EAMD, 62 por ciento). Un poco más de la mitad de aquellas detectadas como no caso a través del EAMD, y el IDARE, entran a psicoterapia; con el CGS, casi 90 por ciento>. Los resultados muestran una alta eficiencia en la captura de pacientes con problemática emocional significativa, siendo un poco menor en la depresión.
The objective of the study was to evaluate patients with perinatal losses referred and not referred to the Psychology Department to determine the efficiency of the referral process to group psychotherapy. Lhe study was carried out with 140 patients; 95 were referred to psychotherapy, while 45 were not. Statistical validity was determined using Wilcoxon's Matched Pairs Lest. Lhe instruments assessed were Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Spielberger's State Lrait Anxiety Inventory (SLAI), and Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale (SRDS). Lhe analysis showed that from the case patients, 70 percent> of those evaluated with the SLAI were referred to group therapy, as were 80 percent> of those evaluated with the GHQ, and 62 percent> of those evaluated with the SRDS. Slightly more than half of those detected as non-case patients with the SRDS and the SLAI entered psychotherapy; as did 90 percent> of those evaluated with the GHQ. Lhe Results show a high efficiency in the referral of patients with significant emotional problems, although with slightly inferior results in the case of depression.